Implementation tiers

What each tier gets for the money, in plain English.

This page exists so a serious buyer can tell the difference between a focused fix, a multi-workflow cleanup, and a true operating-layer build. The price does not go up for fluff. It goes up because the scope, complexity, speed, and level of involvement go up.

Buy the $1,000 assessment Book the review call

How to read the tiers

Starter is for one painful bottleneck

Pick this when one ugly workflow is costing enough money or attention that fixing it cleanly would create immediate relief.

Growth is for connected constraints

Pick this when the first bottleneck exposes a sequence: follow-up, handoffs, scheduling, admin, and reporting keep constraining each other.

Full buildout is for the constraint roadmap

Pick this when the business needs a real operating advantage built around the constraint sequence, not just a patch on one pain point.

Sprint is for one defined build

If a monthly engagement feels early, a fixed-scope sprint can handle one well-bounded project with a clean finish line.

Tier details

Starter

$5k/mo

For one high-value operational problem that needs to stop stealing time now.

Best for: missed leads, slow response, quoting lag, admin follow-up, or one recurring workflow mess that is already obviously expensive.

Expected result: one meaningful pain point gets cleaner, faster, and easier to manage, without trying to rebuild the whole company at once.

One primary workflow fixa focused build around the biggest bottleneck found in the assessment.

One core automation or follow-up systemso a key process stops depending on memory, sticky notes, or repeated manual chasing.

Basic routing and handoff cleanupso work lands in the right place and stops getting lost between people.

Simple visibilityowner-level reporting or checkpoints so you can tell whether the fix is actually working.

Light rollout revisionstightening the first implementation as it meets the real workflow.

This is the right tier when speed and relief matter more than broad system redesign.

Growth

$10k/mo

For businesses where multiple constraints are linked and need to be broken in the right order.

Best for: teams where leads, scheduling, follow-up, coordination, admin, and reporting are all leaking time at once.

Expected result: the business feels noticeably tighter because constraints get addressed in sequence instead of random automations being bolted onto chaos.

Everything in Starter, with broader coveragemore than one critical constraint gets addressed in order.

Multiple workflow automationsacross sales, admin, operations, service, or internal coordination, sequenced by constraint relief.

Cross-step handoff cleanupso tasks move cleanly between people, stages, or departments.

Stronger reporting and visibilityso leadership can actually see flow, slippage, and progress.

Priority sequencingthe right builds happen in the right order instead of random feature chasing.

More active refinementbecause real system cleanup usually needs iteration, not a single pass.

This is usually the sweet spot when the buyer wants meaningful relief without going all the way to a deep buildout.

Full buildout

$25k/mo

For operators who want a real operating layer built around the constraint roadmap, not another temporary patch.

Best for: businesses where slow systems are costing real revenue, management attention, team quality, and growth headroom every month.

Expected result: the business becomes less dependent on heroics, memory, and owner rescue work because the underlying flow of work gets redesigned.

Full implementation roadmapacross the highest-value constraints, not just one lane.

Multiple systems built in parallelwhere needed, so the business gets real momentum instead of isolated wins.

Deeper workflow redesignchanging how work moves through the company, not just adding automation on top of chaos.

Higher-touch iteration and tuningbecause high-value operational changes need tighter stewardship.

Owner-level clarityon what is changing, what is improving, and where leverage is being created.

Built for expensive dragwhere the cost of staying the same is already much higher than the fee.

This tier is for buyers who want a serious advantage, not just a cleaner inbox and a few reminders.

Quick comparison

What changes	Starter	Growth	Full buildout
Primary goal	Fix one painful bottleneck	Break connected constraints in sequence	Build a stronger operating layer around the constraint roadmap
Scope	Narrow and focused	Multi-workflow	Broad and strategic
Automation depth	Core workflow	Several connected automations	Multiple systems and redesigns
Reporting / visibility	Basic	Stronger	Owner-level visibility
Best fit	One expensive mess	Operational pileup	Serious drag across the business

What all paid builds have in common

The assessment decides the recommendation

No one gets shoved into a package just because it is convenient for us. The right tier depends on the real bottlenecks, the financial upside, and the complexity of the fix.

The $1,000 assessment credit still applies

If you move forward, the assessment fee is credited toward the $2,500 setup and equipment fee.

You are not paying for AI theater

The goal is not to impress you with shiny dashboards or jargon. The goal is to remove drag in a way that changes speed, reliability, and operator load.

Sprint is available when that is smarter

If a monthly engagement is too early, we can define one specific build, price it as a sprint, and finish it cleanly.

Start with the assessment, then pick the right build path.

That keeps the sale honest, the recommendation sharp, and the implementation matched to the real problem instead of wishful thinking.

Buy the $1,000 assessment Book the review call